Category Archives: Action

HIGH FIVE PIER 5!   

The Boston Redevelopment Authority, supports a public Pier 5 park and withdraws privatized development Request for Proposals. 

Boston Greenway Crossroad at the Head of the Harbor.

The Pier 5 Association (P5A) is pleased the authority is highly supportive of public open space and ensuring access to Boston harbor in historic Charlestown Navy Yard.  The authority “enthusiastically supports increased open space and/or park creation at Pier 5 through philanthropic or private financing.”

P5A is also grateful for the support of the more than 3200 signatures and donations from the Charlestown community advocating a waterfront park on Pier 5 rather than a private residential/commercial development.

In a statement released by the BRA states it would also be willing to accept an asking price of $0 for Pier 5 if this was economically necessary to support additional public open space or other exceptional public benefits on Pier 5.

The public is excited to revive Pier 5 as a public park. 

For more information to join our continuing efforts to support this important and historic project please visit  www.Pier5.org

  • Please sign the Petition
  • Support the Boston Navy Yard Largest Historic Pier

About Pier 5 Association Inc.

Our mission is to stop privatization of historic, public waterfront designated national park. Our vision is to turn historic Pier 5 into a public Pier 5 park for all! 

Pier 5 Association, Inc. 501 3C is a tax deductible corporation

Media Contact:Rosemary Macero, ramacero@gmail.com 617-494-1115

Pier 5 Request for Proposals | Boston Planning & Development Agency

In accordance with the Charlestown Navy Yard Master Plan, the BPDA released an Request for Proposals (RFP) in September 2020 for the ground lease and redevelopment of Pier 5 in the Charlestown Navy Yard. We received three proposals that we are currently evaluating. Update: The comment period closed on April 5, 2021. The BPDA is currently reviewing the comments received. Materials from February 8, 2021 Proposal Presentations Pier 5 RFP Context 6M: Presentation slides | Video rendering | Response to Q&A New Pier 5: Presentation slides | Video rendering | Response to Q&A Navy Blue: Presentation slides | Video rendering | Response to Q&A Meeting recording Reference Materials Navy Yard Master Plan Implementation Website Pier 5 Request for Proposals Submission: New Pier 5 Submission: Navy Blue Submission: 6M Development BPDA FAQ on the Pier 5 RFP process Documents All Documents »

Pier 5 Request for Proposals | Boston Planning & Development Agency

BPDA Seeks Online Input for PLAN: Charlestown Process

BPDA Seeks Online Input for PLAN: Charlestown Process by Patriot-Bridge Staff • November 17, 2021 • 0 Comments By Adam Swift The PLAN: Charlestown process is continuing with the Boston Planning and Development Agency (BPDA) asking neighborhood residents to take part in a survey to provide feedback on a draft vision statement, goals, and principles for the process. PLAN: Charlestown is a community-driven neighborhood-wide planning initiative that BPDA officials state will create a vision that will help the community thrive over the next 10 to 20 years. “This survey is informed from the many engagement events and opportunities we’ve had so far, and is just a first draft of each item,” an email from the PLAN: Charlestown team stated.  The PLAN: Charlestown process has been bumpy at times. At an online forum to help tighten the visioning process on Oct. 21, BPDA and PLAN: Charlestown team members were peppered with questions about the scope of the project, about the BPDA’s relationship to developers, and about a sometimes foggy view of what qualifies as historic land within the neighborhood. Questions about the PLAN: Charlestown process were also raised by several Charlestown Neighborhood Council (CNC) members and residents at a Nov. 4 CNC meeting. “At the meeting I asked why Plan: Charlestown did not follow the description entered on the BPDA web site. I received no answer of substance but rather was personally attacked,” stated Charlestown resident Gerald Angoff. “ I read from their website: ‘PLAN: Charlestown will establish a comprehensive and coordinated plan to ensure the equitable provision of infrastructure to support future land uses and development, mobility connections into and within Charlestown, parks and open space, climate resiliency, affordable housing, as well as strategies to enhance the existing community and preserve its historic assets. The PLAN: Charlestown team is also in close coordination with an interdepartmental working group across city departments and state transportation agencies.’”  But at the meeting, BPDA community engagement manager Jason Ruggiero said that the PLAN: Charlestown process does comprise the entire community. Anyone interested in taking part in the survey who has not received an email from the BPDA can visit the PLAN: Charlestown website at http://www.bostonplans.org/planning/planning-initiatives/plan-charlestown or email Ruggiero at jason.ruggiero@boston.gov. The survey itself covers some of the same ground as the Oct. 21 online meeting and seeks to garner input from those who were not able to attend. The survey is open until Nov. 22. Questions range from the background of the individuals taking the survey and their familiarity with the PLAN: Charlestown process to feedback on the draft vision statement and draft goals and principle. The draft vision statement reads, “In 2040, Charlestown is a thriving, diverse, accessible, and resilient neighborhood that unites an enhanced historic residential fabric with new affordable homes, jobs, and public parks along Rutherford Avenue and in Sullivan Square.” The draft goals touch upon transportation, housing, climate and the environment, and jobs and businesses. The next phase of the PLAN: Charlestown process, in addition to the feedback on goals, will include a deeper dive into issues such as infrastructure, land use scenarios, and preservation tools as outside consultants are brought on board.

BPDA Seeks Online Input for PLAN: Charlestown Process

Letters to the Editor

To the Editor: A letter to the editor in a recent Vineyard Gazette newspaper, caught my attention and seemed to resonate with me as we are facing monumental development proposals in our one square mile of 20,000 people. The writer stated, “It’s time to allow open meetings on huge controversial plans, wearing a mask of course, but we need to attend open meetings. These virtual meetings may be alright for trying to remove a tree or add a dormer, but huge plans need input from the public. The Vineyard is in trouble.”  We in Charlestown are in trouble. There are monumental building proposals. There will be huge impacts on our infrastructure, green and open space. There will be thousands of new residents added to our one square mile. Surrounded by water we will be severely impacted by climate change and flooding. There are only three ways in and out of Charlestown. The Boston Planning and Development Agency throws out snippets of the upcoming proposals that are currently undergoing via the development process. My challenge to the reader, can you name all the proposals, the height of the buildings, where they are located and the projected number of new residents?  My question to the BPDA is, how many citizens / residents take advantage of one Zoom meeting after another? Are there a sufficient number of respondents to adequately access what people in the community are thinking? Could you please give us a snapshot of how many people respond to your never -ending surveys? There are over 15,000 adults living in Charlestown. Is your response rate acceptable? Can more be done to communicate the proposals and feel comfortable that all in Charlestown are aware of the future building and the impacts on this community? Last week in the Patriot Bridge, “BPDA updates CNC on neighborhood development plans,” I felt that it was hard to digest one proposal after another, where these would be located, how many units, how the Impact Advisory Group is chosen? Most importantly, what land encompasses Plan Charlestown? This question was raised by a resident at this meeting, Is the entire Charlestown, developed and undeveloped land included in Plan Charlestown? Clearly Plan Charlestown does not include the Bunker Hill Housing development, the Navy Yard, Schrafft’s Center, Mystic River area, Sullivan Square, Hood and Rise development, Rutherford Corridor, and the two Bunker Hill Parking Lot sites. What does Plan Charlestown include and exclude?   At this meeting, the facilitator stated that the BPDA does not have the last say in deciding a project as the Zoning Board has to approve or disapprove. As I recall, when concerned citizens went before the Zoning Board regarding the Hood development due to the height and density, the Hood Project was approved. The citizens ultimately are not listened to. As an aside, while attending a Hood Plant meeting years ago, the developer was asked if the building height would set a precedent for future building proposals. The developer stated, “That would not be a bad precedent to set.” Here we are years later and now experiencing that precedent. There are 2,700 signatures for a Master Plan for Charlestown that were collected in 2019 and rejected by the BPDA. Major cities all over the nation have a Master Plan. Boston needs to step up and realize business as usual is not working and not fair, this is the 21st century. Listen up BPDA, your time is up. It’s time to reset and engage the community in a meaningful way so that we all understand what’s at stake. A picture is worth a thousand words. Take out a full- page ad in the Patriot Bridge, provide a map, and show the reader just what Plan Charlestown entails. Where the new proposals are located, the height of the buildings, the number of potential residents, the amount of open and green space for all the new residents, as well as all the current development that has taken place over the last few years. Do the right thing for Charlestown and reset your strategy and include all of Charlestown. Stop with your nebulous on -line surveys. Step up to the plate and listen. Charlestown wants a better quality of life, clean air, transportation, schools, more open and green space, and more affordable housing for themselves, the community and for future residents. What don’t you understand in this picture?  Ann Kelleher

Letters to the Editor

Newsletter: Wu Wu! Tell the new mayor to prioritize bold climate justice action!

Join us Thurs, 11/18 to help plan our next steps to fight climate change in Boston! Good afternoon Zachary, There’s a lot happening in the battle against climate change in Boston. Read on to find out more and learn how you can get involved. Campaign Update – BERDO Victory Celebration! The strength of Boston’s climate action coalition was celebrated in style at the BERDO victory party two days after the election of climate champion Michelle Wu as Mayor. Dwaign Tyndal of ACE and many other speakers noted that passage of the revised BERDO ordinance is just the beginning of the battle for implementation, but it was certainly a great milestone.    During the BERDO campaign, BCAN: Collected over 2,000 petition signatures Solicited 210 letters to City Councilors Canvassed 9 different neighborhoods of Boston Presented to 14 different neighborhood and student organizations Produced 3 videos for Boston Neighborhood News and social media Organized 6 meetings with City Councilors and coalition reps Built relationships and engaged deeply with community members Thank you so much to the partners and allies who attended, spoke, and led this historic victory with us.    Check here for photos and more details about the event, and here for a video of the 30-minute speaker program.   Solidarity Spotlight – Our Green Justice Coalition Partners are Hiring! Communications Director, City Life / Vida Urbana Director, Homes for All Massachusetts Microgrid Manager, GreenRoots Coalition Organizer, Mass Renews Alliance Capacity Building Director, Chinese Progressive Association Office Manager and Events Coordinator, Chinese Progressive Association (Thank you to Community Labor United for putting these together!)   Climate News – Don’t Swap One Dirty Fuel for Another A research team from Harvard’s T. H. Chan School of Public Health studied the health impacts of air pollution in the United States between 2008 and 2017. In addition to greenhouse gases, the burning of carbon-based fuels also produces PM2.5, a type of pollution consisting of tiny particles. The Harvard report focused on the PM2.5 coming from buildings and other “stationary fuel combustion sources.” During the time studied, coal use was decreasing in favor of gas, wood, and biomass. The study found that as health impacts from coal went down, those from the other three fuels went up. The authors concluded that “the increasing role of gas and biomass and wood emissions in the health burden of PM2.5 exposure indicates that swapping one air pollution-emitting fuel source for another is not a pathway to a healthy energy system.” The website of RMI, a non-profit devoted to clean energy, shows an interactive map based on data from the Harvard study. It shows that, in Massachusetts, air pollution caused 749 deaths and cost $8.4 billion in health impacts in 2017. What Can You Do? We celebrate the election of Mayor-Elect Wu, a strong climate advocate, and we must continue to fight against catastrophic climate change. Sign our petition and let Mayor-Elect Wu know that we want to see even bolder climate justice action by the City of Boston under her leadership. You can also fill out the community survey by the Wu transition team, expressing your concern and demand for action to fight climate change.   Upcoming Events   Massachusetts Climate Future Forum Sunday, November 14, 7pm | Register here Speakers include Bill McKibben of 350.org, the Rev. Vernon Walker of Communities Responding to Extreme Weather, Cabell Eames of A Better Future Project, and Senator Ed Markey.   BCAN Action Team meeting Thursday, November 18, 6-8pm | There is a new zoom registration, so you need to register again, even if you have before. Info-share about Mayor-Elect Wu’s Green New Deal plan and more   MCAN: Net Zero For All/Better Buildings webinar Monday, November 22, 7pm | Register here Educational webinar for the net zero stretch code   52nd Annual Day of Mourning Thursday, November 25, 12pm Cole’s Hill, Plymouth, MA | Information at http://www.uaine.org/  Indigenous folks all over the country and globe are on the frontlines of the most bold and just climate actions. Indigenous Rights and the Land Back movement are essential to the climate movement. Since 1970, Indigenous people & their allies have gathered at noon on Cole’s Hill in Plymouth to commemorate a National Day of Mourning on the US Thanksgiving holiday. Participants in the National Day of Mourning honor Indigenous ancestors and Native resilience. It is a day of remembrance and spiritual connection, as well as a protest against the racism and oppression that Indigenous people continue to experience worldwide.   For more events in and around our community, visit the BCAN Events Calendar. Just for Fun   Tällberg’s Jazz for the Planet was recorded by GBH in Boston this month. Support the fight for climate justice in Boston! Donate to BostonCAN Register here to attend BCAN’s Action Team meetings. Want to continue the conversation? Join the Action Team GoogleGroup listserv! Facebook Instagram Twitter Sent via ActionNetwork.org. To update your email address, change your name or address, or to stop receiving emails from Boston Climate Action Network, please click here.

Please send your comments: It is time to be heard: What do you think??

At the last “PLAN” Charlestown meeting, the BPDA stated they “heard” from the community, and shared the slide that  83 respondents commented below. The BPDA survey will be online and open for feedback for two weeks following the workshop through November 22, 2021. PLEASE COMMENT on “PLAN”: Charlestown, please reach out to Jason Ruggiero at jason.ruggiero@boston.gov. 83 respondents versus 2700 signatures for a Charlestown Master Plan procured by WethePeople02129 group  (with the efforts of Ann Kelleher, Toby Goldstein and Rosemary Kverick) 2700 signatures to request from Mayor Martin J Walsh that Charlestown have a Master Plan: Charlestown Preservation Society (CPS) President Amanda Zettel and Charlestown Historic Society (CHS) President Julie Hall took the 2700 signatures to a meeting with Mayor Walsh and with the  BRA Executive team, requesting a Master Plan for the entire Charlestown community, a true Master Plan.

Julie and Amanda reported after the meeting, that “The Mayor gave us his word” and “We did it.”  In less than a day, the BRA announced there was NO Master Plan for Charlestown however they would do (another) study of the Rutherford corridor. The Charlestown community pushed back. The BPDA concocted “PLAN” Charlestown which does NOT include any of the development sites which will impact ALL of Charlestown residents. CPS and CHS support “PLAN” Charlestown despite ALL these $Billions of development, on approximately 100 acres, with thousands of new residents which impact residents on this one square mile are NOT INCLUDED: The Bunker Hill Housing: The largest public housing in New England, slated to expand to 2699 units, on 26 acres, with fifteen  massive buildings; with five of the buildings ten stories high will be segregated affordable, elevatored buildings with slivers of greenspace, next to the Tobin Bridge… Segregated housing in a community with tablets of the names of the brave citizens fallen and dead at the Civil War.    THIS project is TEN STORIES high replacing 3 stories, yet the development team claims it is integrated in the fabric of our community. It is NOT. 

These buildings are half the height of the Bunker Hill Monument, which now can be seen for miles, and is our nation’s first Monument, which should be preserved and protected.  These renderings are misleading.  The Revere Sugar site/Schrafft:  Massive 21 acre waterfront development  https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2021/09/30/massive-charlestown-waterfront-project-would-inclu.html Sullivan Square:   RISE DEVELOPMENT: 5 ACRES https://www.nbcboston.com/boston-business-journal/massive-redevelopment-project-proposed-for-charlestowns-sullivan-square/2499036/ Including BRA owned sites and One Mystic, 685 units (1400 residents) with 240 parking spaces.  https://www.bostonplans.org/projects/development-projects/one-mystic-avenue Curiously, The BPDA opposed the density: https://charlestownbridge.com/2021/05/20/one-mystic-opening-meeting-pits-union-leaders-against-bpda-opposition/ HOOD PLANT: 20 ACRES of development http://www.bostonplans.org/getattachment/c3c22f97-57e6-4ed0-adc5-49a20ea4514b      http://www.bostonplans.org/projects/development-projects/hood-park-master-plan-npc       The greenspace is not that large. Go see it. RUTHERFORD Corridor: Expansive Development opportunities RELATED BEAL: 4.37 Acres of development CHARLESTOWN NAVY YARD: NATIONAL PARK SERVICE: 13 ACRES    Master Plan for Visitor Center https://charlestownbridge.com/2021/05/26/national-parks-to-host-engagement-meeting-on-navy-yard-master-plan/ https://parkplanning.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectID=90626 NONE of the sites above are included in PLAN Charlestown.  83 Respondents are “heard” over 2700 signatures for a Master Plan.  (What is PLAN Charlestown? Monument Avenue? Monument Square Area? What “planning” is needed there?) JUST THOUGHT YOU MIGHT WANT TO KNOW. LET OTHERS KNOW As was mentioned at the CNC meeting, “Since there is a newly elected Mayor…why don’t the BPDA take a pause?” https://bpda.app.box.com/s/r7v31yw8ielmhuaq8uochkf6l7oiignf “WHY DON’T THE BPDA LISTEN?” WHY IS THE COMMUNITY NOT HEARD but 83 respondents are considered valid? It is NOT a valid sample of Charlestown. http://charlestownbridge.com/2021/10/28/plan-charlestown-process-creates-more-questions-as-it-moves-forward/ 36 CONTRIBUTORS vs 2700 SIGNATURES https://map.social/Community.php?CommunityID=295 PLEASE COMMENT:   This survey will be online and open for feedback through November 22, 2021. PLEASE COMMENT about PLAN: Charlestown, please reach out to Jason Ruggiero at jason.ruggiero@boston.gov.

The Bunker Hill Housing:The largest public housing in New England, slated to expand to 2699 units, on 26 acres, with fifteen  massive buildings; with five of the buildings ten stories high will be segregated affordable, elevatored buildings with slivers of greenspace, next to the Tobin Bridge… Segregated housing in a community with tablets of the names of the brave citizens fallen and dead at the Civil War. 

image.png
THIS project is TEN STORIES high replacing 3 stories, yet the development team claims it is integrated in the fabric of our community. It is NOT. 
These buildings are half the height of the Bunker Hill Monument, which now can be seen for miles, and is our nation’s first Monument, which should be preserved and protected.  These renderings are misleading. 

image.png
The Revere Sugar site/Schrafft:  Massive 21 acre waterfront development 
https://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2021/09/30/massive-charlestown-waterfront-project-would-inclu.html


Sullivan Square:  RISE DEVELOPMENT: 5 ACRES

image.png
https://www.nbcboston.com/boston-business-journal/massive-redevelopment-project-proposed-for-charlestowns-sullivan-square/2499036/

Including BRA owned sites and One Mystic, 685 units (1400 residents) with 240 parking spaces. 
https://www.bostonplans.org/projects/development-projects/one-mystic-avenue
image.png
Curiously, The BPDA opposed the density:
Displaying image.png

https://charlestownbridge.com/2021/05/20/one-mystic-opening-meeting-pits-union-leaders-against-bpda-opposition/

HOOD PLANT: 20 ACRES of development http://www.bostonplans.org/getattachment/c3c22f97-57e6-4ed0-adc5-49a20ea4514b

http://www.bostonplans.org/projects/development-projects/hood-park-master-plan-npc

image.png
 The greenspace is not that large. Go see it.

RUTHERFORD Corridor: Expansive Development opportunities

RELATED BEAL: 4.37 Acres of development

image.png

CHARLESTOWN NAVY YARD:NATIONAL PARK SERVICE: 13 ACRES    Master Plan for Visitor Center

image.png

https://charlestownbridge.com/2021/05/26/national-parks-to-host-engagement-meeting-on-navy-yard-master-plan/
https://parkplanning.nps.gov/projectHome.cfm?projectID=90626

image.png

NONE of the sites above are included in PLAN Charlestown. 83 Respondents are “heard” over 2700 signatures for a Master Plan. (What is PLAN Charlestown? Monument Avenue? Monument Square Area? What “planning” is needed there?)
JUST THOUGHT YOU MIGHT WANT TO KNOW. LET OTHERS KNOWAs was mentioned at the CNC meeting, “Since there is a newly elected Mayor…why don’t the BPDA take a pause?”https://bpda.app.box.com/s/r7v31yw8ielmhuaq8uochkf6l7oiignf
“WHY DON’T THE BPDA LISTEN?” WHY IS THE COMMUNITY NOT HEARD but 83 respondents are considered valid?It is NOT a valid sample of Charlestown. http://charlestownbridge.com/2021/10/28/plan-charlestown-process-creates-more-questions-as-it-moves-forward/
36 CONTRIBUTORS vs 2700 SIGNATURES

36 CONTRIBUTORS vs 2700 SIGNATURES

image.png

https://map.social/Community.php?CommunityID=295
PLEASE COMMENT:  This survey will be online and open for feedback through November 22, 2021. PLEASE COMMENT about PLAN: Charlestown, please reach out to Jason Ruggiero at jason.ruggiero@boston.gov.

36 CONTRIBUTORS vs 2700 SIGNATURES

image.png

https://map.social/Community.php?CommunityID=295
PLEASE COMMENT:  This survey will be online and open for feedback through November 22, 2021. PLEASE COMMENT about PLAN: Charlestown, please reach out to Jason Ruggiero at jason.ruggiero@boston.gov.

BPDA & FCNY Joint Virtual Meeting – Nov. 9th at 6PM: RE: Public Activation – Friends of the Charlestown Navy Yard

November 3, 2021

The BPDA will be joining Friends of the Charlestown Navy Yard to discuss public activation in the Navy Yard on November 9 at 6:00PM. Please join this virtual meeting.
Join Zoom Meetinghttps://us02web.zoom.us/j/82543948754<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus02web.zoom.us%2Fj%2F82543948754&data=04%7C01%7C%7Ce33945af2f874695b8ed08d99d58e5ef%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637713827417675979%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=bMfVyYnmRuT%2FVYHcgz%2Bx8t83mQ7Rne7vKuq0NGKNbBA%3D&reserved=0>Meeting ID: 825 4394 8754Passcode: 899305One tap mobile+13126266799,,82543948754#,,,,*899305# US (Chicago)+16465588656,,82543948754#,,,,*899305# US (New York)Dial by your location   +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)   +1 646 558 8656 US (New York)   +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)   +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)   +1 669 900 9128 US (San Jose)   +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)Meeting ID: 825 4394 8754Passcode: 899305Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/keplPxFZRC<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fus02web.zoom.us%2Fu%2FkeplPxFZRC&data=04%7C01%7C%7Ce33945af2f874695b8ed08d99d58e5ef%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637713827417675979%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=5nO0bAHRb%2F0Gz1IybBBNUmLJ11Qf09NvRe5YMbXSwj0%3D&reserved=0>